<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>"MEDIA MATTERS Watch" : Media Matters' Falsehoods Exposed!</title>
	<link>http://mediamatters.blogsome.com</link>
	<description>A rebuttal to  some of the lies, smears, and misleading work of MMFA.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:18:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>

	<item>
		<title>*** MEDIA MATTERS Watch: Top Posts ***</title>
		<description>	Are you looking for a site that chronicles some of the falsehoods, errors, and misleading work of Media Matters? Welcome!
	Scroll down for our latest posts. However, if you are quickly looking for a few good posts to illustrate to your friends how Media Matters misleads their readers and provides fallacious ...</description>
		<link>http://mediamatters.blogsome.com/2006/10/01/media-matters-watch-top-posts/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Media Matters&#8217; Bogus Attack on Bill O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s &#8216;Culture Warrior&#8217; Rife With Dishonesty and Deception</title>
		<description>	A September 22, 2006, post by Media Matters is a long and rambling attempt to&nbsp;besmirch Bill O&#8217;Reilly and his new book, Culture Warrior. Not surprisingly, the one who is ultimately debunked is Media Matters.
	MMatters&#8217; post contains a&nbsp;lengthy list&nbsp;of deception and misleading information. Here you go:
	1.
	 
	What Media Matters doesn&#8217;t tell ...</description>
		<link>http://mediamatters.blogsome.com/2006/09/23/media-matters-bogus-culture-warrior-attack/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Media Matters Propagates Bill Maher Falsehood</title>
		<description>	On September 15, 2006, HBO&#8217;s Bill Maher claimed that CBS Evening News would not allow him to discuss religion on its &quot;Free Speech&quot; segment.
	Media Matters jumped on the story and splashed it on the top of its front page.
	The problem is that the story wasn&#8217;t true. The evidence suggests that ...</description>
		<link>http://mediamatters.blogsome.com/2006/09/21/media-matters-propagates-bill-maher-falsehood/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Media Matters Serves Up a Host of Falsehoods on Joe Wilson Affair</title>
		<description>	Reaching a new level of desperation, a September 7, 2006, post is rife with errors, falsehoods, and inaccuracies. MMatters makes an absolutely ridiculous attempt to save its face regarding the Joe Wilson-Valerie Plame affair. MMatters and other liberal outlets&nbsp;have been roundly discredited since it has now been publicly confirmed that ...</description>
		<link>http://mediamatters.blogsome.com/2006/09/07/media-matters-serves-up-a-host-of-falsehoods/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>More Misinformation from Media Matters in Smear of President Bush and VP Cheney</title>
		<description>	An August 31, 2006, post by Media Matters continues to underscore the organization&#8217;s dishonesty in their presentation of facts. In the post, MMatters takes issue with an interview with President Bush conducted by the liberal Brian Williams that aired on NBC and MSNBC August 29 and 30, 2006.&nbsp;There are several ...</description>
		<link>http://mediamatters.blogsome.com/2006/09/01/more-misinformation-from-media-matters-in-smear-of-president-bush-and-vp-cheney/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Media Matters Touts Sham Science, Falsely Attacks George Will</title>
		<description>	An August 29, 2006, post by Media Matters falsely claims that columnist and commentator George Will &quot;misrepresented a reported scientific breakthrough.&quot;
	Mr. Will clearly did no such thing. Media Matters&#8217; bogus attack stems from an announcement from a company called Advanced Cell Technology (ACT) that claimed it&nbsp;&quot;successfully generated human embryonic stem ...</description>
		<link>http://mediamatters.blogsome.com/2006/08/28/media-matters-falsely-attacks-george-will/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Media Matters Falsely Attacks Chuck Colson</title>
		<description>	Here is another classic case in which readers must investigate themselves the veracity of claims made by Media Matters.
	An August 22, 2006, post makes the follwing false claim:
	
	The truth? Colson&nbsp;did no such thing. In making their false claim, Media Matters cites an August 16, 2006, &quot;BreakPoint&quot; commentary by Mr Colson.
	Colson ...</description>
		<link>http://mediamatters.blogsome.com/2006/08/25/media-matters-falsely-attacks-of-chuck-colson/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Media Matters&#8217; Bogus Endnotes Attack (PART II)</title>
		<description>	This is PART II (here&#8217;s PART I) of debunking Media Matters&#8217; August 7, 2006, post, which executes a bogus attack on Ann Coulter&#8217;s endnotes in her book, Godless. As we clearly show, MMatters falsely asserts that Ann deliberately &quot;misrepresented&quot; or &quot;distorted&quot; her sources or information.
	Let the debunking continue:
	4. (MMatters #9) ...</description>
		<link>http://mediamatters.blogsome.com/2006/08/15/media-matters-bogus-endnotes-attack-part-ii/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>New Low in Deception From Media Matters In Bogus Attack on Ann Coulter (PART I)</title>
		<description>	As&nbsp;duplicitous as Media Matters has been in the past,&nbsp;a post on August 7, 2006, attacking Ann Coulter&nbsp;is especially low&nbsp;for the organization.
	Staffers at Media Matters spent considerable time combing through the text and endnotes of Ann Coulter&#8217;s latest book, Godless. MMatters has examined her book with the proverbial fine-tooth comb. They ...</description>
		<link>http://mediamatters.blogsome.com/2006/08/08/bogus-attack-on-ann-coulter-part-i/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Erroneous Information + False Claim = Another Bogus Media Matters Post</title>
		<description>	An August 2, 2006, post from Media Matters contains a false claim and erroneous information.
	 
	1. Erroneous information: Media Matters claims that the allegation that Hillary Clinton made an anti-Semitic slur in 1974 has been &quot;discredited.&quot; This is simply false. As this 2000 CNN article clearly reveals, three principle witnesses, ...</description>
		<link>http://mediamatters.blogsome.com/2006/08/03/erroneous-information-false-claim-another-bogus-media-matters-post/</link>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
